This is not the first time such a thing has happened, and experts know that DGT usually does it many times. You just have to pay attention to the sanctions you receive when they are received, which is included in them, and observe the photos very well. Remember that the deadline for each claim is 20 days from the date of receipt. In the case of penalties for wearing a radar inhibitor, is it sufficient to have a presumption of accuracy on the part of the officer who says that one of these devices is being transported, or is it necessary to prove that the device installed in the vehicle is actually being transported? The decision also states that both photos must have a device ID that detects the speed, date and time of the event, recorded speed, or mileage point of the device. And this data must correspond to the complaint form, otherwise, it is already a reason to lay charges. I have doubts about the proper functioning of radars in bad weather In case of heavy rain, are radars, fixed and mobile, effective?. The usual procedure in Spain, which is different from other countries in our region, is to identify the speed of a vehicle immediately after crossing the gate or vertical pole on which there is a fixed radar, thus taking an image of the vehicle travelling at an excessive speed from its rear. However, this does not necessarily always have to be the case. On more than one occasion, we have pointed out that traffic fines have been refined from a legal perspective to reduce the large number of charges and resources for drivers who are sanctioned for one reason or another. The collection exploded by offering a 50% „discount“ for admitting guilt and not being demanding. If you see the sanction very clearly and the photos are correct, do not ask for the claim.
Pay the fine as soon as possible to get that 50%. Fixed and elongated radars installed on gates usually detect vehicles when they have already passed the point where the radar is located in the direction of travel. Radars in vehicles camouflaged in motion detect cars traveling at high speed in the same direction of travel. Mobile radars in camouflaged vehicles stopped on the emergency lane and tripods can detect speeding in both directions, although they usually do so in the direction of traffic in the adjacent lane. Another question is how to make vehicles that do not have a license plate on the front, such as a motorcycle that can punish head-on. In this case, the radar can also detect the violation, but what cannot be identified at first is that the vehicle cannot be identified. Once you receive a fine, you must pay attention to all the details presented to us. And one of those basic details is exactly the photos that are attached. The consultation that has been presented to us in recent days should dispel any doubt about the control systems of the Directorate-General for Transport, which are more common than we imagine. A camouflaged car is stopped on the emergency lane, in the opposite direction, can the radar pursue me? Could I be penalized for speeding if I go too fast at their height? DGT continues to expand its surveillance capabilities, including radars that identify speeding. Can a DGT radar chase me in the opposite direction? Technically, the cinematometers used by DGT are prepared to identify the speed at which a vehicle is moving away, but also the speed of any vehicle approaching the radar itself in the opposite direction.
The question of whether a radar can detect the speed of vehicles travelling in the lane in which it is located or vehicles approaching in the opposite direction has more to do with the orientation of the kinemometer and the camera that detects the vehicle, the presence of obstacles and the typology of speed control itself. as well as other practical issues. This would require the use of visual identification by the enforcement officer, who is remembered to have a presumption of veracity in the performance of his or her duties. If the radar has detected an offence, the officer may request the vehicle to be stopped to notify the penalty when the identification of the offending subject is reached, if the motorcycle and clothing suit him, and then the officer is ratified. The evidence used in this type of complaint is precisely the testimony of the officer who actually has a presumption of truthfulness. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a written communication of allegations may be submitted requesting the complainant`s ratification report, setting out the steps taken to conclude that it was a radar inhibitor and not merely a warning device. Yes, radars can also go in the opposite direction (even motorcycles) in Motorpasión | Would you respect the speed limits if you could get a prize in return? Sweden tried the radar lottery The data was deleted for privacy reasons, as this is a different case from the decision, proof that it happens every day.